🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy offers a flawed view of Europe. It claims that unrestrained immigration and so-called "progressive" policies represent an existential risk to European civilization. However, this argument rests on a fundamental misreading of the reality. The true challenge confronting the EU is not cultural but technological and economic backwardness.

A Glaring Economic Gap Between the US and Europe

The data reveal a stark contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by eighty-seven percent, while a paltry 13.5% increase for the EU. During this time, European income per person dropped from over three-quarters to just 50% of the US level. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now boasts a higher per capita income than several leading EU nations like France and Italy.

Currently, roughly 50% of the global 50 largest tech companies are American, while a mere four are from Europe.

The Technological Deficit: The Core Question

The growing economic gap is driven by superior productivity growth in the United States, fueled by breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The scene of global tech leadership is overwhelmingly American. Over the past fifty years, 241 US firms have grown into enterprises valued at over $10bn, compared with just 14 in Europe.

This disparity prompts a vital issue: In the race for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, what is Europe positioned? Experts widely concede it is essentially a contest between two between the United States and China, with Europe starting at a significant handicap.

Root Causes of Europe's Innovation Gap

A number of key factors account for this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a far deeper and more dynamic system for funding startups. Europe has yet to establish a true unified investment market, a factor that limits the growth potential of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided rules hinder Europe. A US startup can launch a service under a single regulatory framework to access a market of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a larger population, is divided among 27 different national systems, creating significant market obstacles.
• Mindset Differences: Views on risk-taking vary greatly. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was historically viewed with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's chronic underinvestment in defense has eroded its ability in pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, one can find causes for optimism. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have started to propose serious reform. Key reports on European competitiveness and the internal market highlight the need for major reforms.

Given appropriate incentives and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths might enable much higher levels of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent retains considerable advantages: high-quality human capital, top-tier schools and universities, and premier labs. Coupled with a vast domestic consumer base and substantial household savings, these elements could unleash a surge of investment and entrepreneurship.

Crucially, even if Europe does not take the lead in creating cutting-edge technologies, it can still significantly increase economic output by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

Europe now stands at a critical crossroads. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, the continent's technological decline has been gradual. But, without decisive action to address its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could give way to a rapid and permanent loss of global economic relevance.